Land Decisions Aren't Binary: How to Stop Treating Door A vs Door B Like a Test

By Drew Haney · Founder, Rooster Capital · May 2, 2026

I think this is the single most useful mental model I've shared on a podcast in the last two years. The reason most operators paralyze themselves on a decision isn't lack of information. It's the assumption that the answer is binary.

The mistake: treating every choice like a test with one right answer

"Discernment in general, I think, is hard. I think a lot of times we think we have door A, door B, and door C, and we think that the right answer is only behind one door. We think it's binary, and it's not like that. There's better doors and worse doors, but it's not binary." — Drew, on REtipster Podcast (Jan 2026)

I see this in operators all the time. They're trying to decide:

They sit on these decisions for months. Sometimes years. Because they're convinced one answer will reveal itself as right and the others as wrong.

The reframe: "better" and "worse," not "right" and "wrong"

Almost every business decision has multiple paths that work. Some are better than others. Some are worse. None are binary. Once you accept that, the paralysis breaks. You can pick the path that fits your life right now and adjust later. The risk of picking the worse-but-not-wrong door is lower than the cost of waiting six months to find the perfect one.

"And I think we're so afraid of making the wrong decision and missing out, right, FOMO. So once we realize that it's not binary, I think it really helps a lot." — Drew, REtipster Podcast (Jan 2026)

How I apply this when I'm coaching operators

When an operator brings me a binary question — "Should I do X or Y?" — my first move is to dissolve the binary. I'll ask:

  1. What does the next six months look like under each option? If the answer is "either path is workable, just different," that's a tell that it's not binary.
  2. What's the cost of switching later? Most decisions are reversible. The cost of changing your mind in nine months is usually lower than the cost of nine months of indecision.
  3. Which option fits your current life constraints? The "best" answer in the abstract is sometimes the wrong answer for your actual season — new baby, new W-2, new market.

Why this matters for funders too

I apply the same lens to my own decisions about which capital partners to take on, which markets to lean into, which operators to deepen with. If I treated every one of those as a single right answer, I'd never act. Treating it as "better and worse doors" gets me moving, and then the data from the move tells me whether to course-correct.

The shortcut: what would you do if a friend asked you the same question?

One last test. When you can't decide between A and B, ask: if a friend asked me this exact question, what would I tell them? Almost always, the answer is obvious. The thing slowing you down is the FOMO of being the one to make the call. Make the call.

Source: Land Funding: Risky, Stressful or Genius? · REtipster Podcast with Seth Williams (2026-01-13). Listen →

Stop debating. Start funding.

If you've been debating whether to bring on a JV partner for six months, the cost of that debate is bigger than picking a worse door.

Submit a deal →